Gender Perceptions in “My Body”

Shelley Jackson’s My Body — A Wunderkammer is ripe with ideas relating to gender and identity.  She addresses various aspects of femininity/masculinity in a manner which calls our attention to gender binaries. The work ultimately challenges and subverts these binaries, I think — celebrating the body for its flaws and deficiencies as well as its strengths and beauties.   The text, however, is filled with insecurities regarding body image; specifically insecurities and conflicts which arise from her more stereotypically masculine traits.

Those traits — her muscular, football player arms and shoulders, for one example, are often described in relation to monstrosity.  Jackson writes that her body is “just one jot off a Frankenstein monster.”  She writes about having her gender interrogated by her peers when she was younger and wishing for “a third restroom, the one for monsters and hermaphrodites.” She occupies a space of otherness in her feelings of monstrosity and mixed femininity and masculinity, which provokes the reader to reconsider what these binaries mean and how they may shape our experience of the world.

Her discussions of body hair are another way that she frames this other space, as conventional gender binaries cast men as hairy, women as hairless.  She illustrates her struggle between rebellion and conformity in her discussions of her leg hair, saying “I shaved my leg hair defensively, I grew it back dogmatically, I shaved it guiltily, I grew it back proudly, I shaved it experimentally, I grew it back humorously.”  Her ever shifting attitudes as she grows up reflect her constant negotiation of the societal norms which influence the conception of gender.

And yet there is a curious disconnect between her accounts of feeling monstrous, her descriptions of the body as a cabinet of wonders, and her interwoven depictions of the body as a subject for art.  The artistic gaze creates a view of the body as something simultaneously strange and familiar; it also offers a space to disconnect from societal perceptions.  She writes that “drawing is an antidote to judgement,” where the process of thoroughly seeing and noticing the individual elements of the human body demands a kind of understanding not readily given in much of societal interaction.

Even in this there is conflict, and she acknowledges that she is herself susceptible to all the varying reactions a person may have towards the body — desire, disgust, curiosity, and so on.  The work describes the continuous process of coming to know and understand one’s own body, and how that body is read by others.  She offers up her own body for exploration, for an interrogation that is somewhat reminiscent of the locker room interrogations she recounts.  But it is an important shift that she gives it willingly, in her own words with her own explorations and explanations, rather than in a defensive  attempt to prove her worth and identity.  This offering is ultimately a way of reclaiming her body and celebrating its reality outside of constraining gender binaries, pushing us to consider how often these binaries fall short of more complete truths.

 

Shelley Jackson’s “my body – a Wunderkammer” and Posthumanism

I know that pkeily already posted on this work (because it’s just that awesome), so I’m going to add to it in the form of an analysis.  As the previous poster explained, Shelley Jackson’s “my body – a Wunderkammer” is a hypertext work that essentially tells a coming-of-age short story, specifically about the development of the female body.  The work is semi-autobiographical and I highly recommend it. I found the experience of reading it less destabilizing than that of reading Kendall’s poems.  The links turn a different color once you’ve clicked on them and if you run into a dead end, you can always go back to the picture of the whole body and click on the parts you missed.  I also recommend this particular work because it’s interesting and innovative.  The drawings are all Jackson’s, and the stories of the individual body parts, which are very like vignettes, are striking (and sometimes graphic, so body-squeamish people may not enjoy all of them).

But onto the analysis!

I studied this work last semester for my major paper in Dr. Whalen’s seminar class (which I highly recommend).  My thesis focused on the ways that postmodern works of literature (a genre which necessarily includes electronic literature) respond to posthumanism. N. Katherine Hayles explains in How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics that “[i]n the posthuman, there are no essential differences or absolute demarcations between bodily existence and computer simulation, cybernetic mechanism and biological organism, robot teleology and human goals” (7). In a posthuman world, minds detach from bodies and become the most important entity, while personal identity fades in favor of a collective intelligence (8).  It’s an exciting and terrifying idea of the direction in which humanity, technology, and, of course, literature, are heading.

I see Jackson’s work as a glorification of the human body, and therefore a defense against the detachment of it from the mind.  While much of what goes on in the world of computers seems to leave behind the idea that the body matters, Jackson’s work reminds us of its beauty, complexity, and individuality in ways that act to preserve it.  Her other major work is called Patchwork Girl, a hypertext novel that retells the Frankenstein story with a female monster.  She is also currently working a project entitled “Skin,” a short story that will be told via tattoos on the bodies of volunteers.  Jackson focuses on bodies throughout her work, and such a widespread subject cannot and should not be overlooked.  For readers who have so far found hypertext inaccessible or hard to follow, or those who feel detached from e-lit because its medium feels less physical than traditional books, “my body” restores humanity to the genre with its frank anecdotes about the very basic and non-digital naked human form.

Works Cited

Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 1999. Print.

Jackson, Shelley. “my body – a Wunderkammer.” 25 Jan. 2012. <http://www.altx.com/thebody/body.html>.

 

Shelley Jackson’s “my body – a Wunderkammer”

Like others who have already posted I have little experience with Electronic Literature, so I picked a work from the Electronic Literature Collection (Volume 1).  The stark black and white woodcut icon for Shelley Jackson’s my body – a Wunderkammer appealed to me aesthetically, so I decided to explore her work.

Title screen of "my body - a Wunderkammer"

The title page of Jackson’s works contains links to the work and a section of notes, a short piece of ambient music also plays. The notes section reveals my body was created with StorySpace and publsihed by EastGate Systems, like the works we read by Robert Kendall. Unsurprisingly, my body is very similar in format to Penetration and Disposession. All three works start with a map of words to pick from and links to other parts of the work are incorporated into the text. In Kendall’s work the links are outside of the text of his poems and the different screens are headed by different words. Jackson embeds her links within the text of her “semi-autobiographical” reflections and each new screen corresponds to a specific body part and Jackson’s memories and/or thoughts pertaining to every body part, many screens also contain woodcuts of the body part in question. As one explores Jackson’s body the links already accessed turn from blue to purple.

Text map for “my body”

The text seems mostly to be nonfiction based on Jackson’s own life, but some content is undoubtedly fictitious. For example, on this screen Jackson tells a story of deciding to become a writer after rewriting Joyce by putting pages of his work inside of her. Jackson comments on her own mixture of fact and fiction throughout the work, even saying “Realism lay slightly short of the exact copy” when recounting the process of learning to draw teeth.

As a piece of nonfiction my body is interesting because it brings up the issue of mixing fiction in with the truth. Some would say the two should be kept separate, but I think that  fictive elements can be used to bolster the impact of the author’s story. In creative nonfiction it is common for authors to take a non-chronological approach to story-telling, oftentimes bringing together anecdotes without strict chronology. However, a text-only nonfiction essay still must be read in the order the author decided. The use of an electronic form, StorySpace, mirrors the non-chronological and kaleidoscopic content common in nonfiction.