Youtube Interactive Videos

Psh! Why just watch Youtube videos when you could PLAY them? Rather than just staring at the computer screen, new kinds of videos called Interactive Videos encourage users to interact with the video by clicking on the embedded annotations. This fad started around 2008 when annotations were first created, originally used for commentary purposes. Videos like these are like the modern day “Choose Your Own Adventure” stories because they let the user determine how the story is played. The videos work by presenting the user with different choices, and whatever choice the user clicks, the video skips to that specific time segment or it jumps to a different video altogether. The videos visited are based on what paths the user follows.

This interactive game called “Luigi’s Mansion Interactive” contains over 20 videos. The user must help Luigi save Princess Daisy from the evil clutches of Waluigi in the haunted mansion. Over half of the videos in the whole story are complete nonsense that is meant to stall time (oh god…there’s one that is over an hour long). The others are videos that make you lose the game and start from the last point. Also with this game, the user is given a mini assignment along with the original quest, and that is to find all of the mushrooms in every video. The ones who find all the mushrooms win a free t-shirt from the producers. (I won a t-shirt from them!)

YouTube Preview Image

Still Standing/Text Rain

Wow, I am absolutely amazed at these two pieces of electronic literature.  First off, Still Standing was found through the Electronic Literature Volume 2 page on our website and a direct link can be found here.  The information about Still Standing can be found here.  From the description, Still Standing invites participants to use their bodies as reading instruments.  My mind was blown when I read this.  This is LITERALLY interactive fiction and puts all other works to shame IMO.  Although we are unable to do it ourselves, the best that I could find were videos of others working through it.  Text Rain is another version and seems to be more interesting to me.  The website for Text Rain can be found here.  There is a video of Text Rain inside that link.

Okay, so Still Standing is basically this.  You move in front of the screen and you move the text that is on the screen.  If you stand still long enough, the letters copy your image and create a piece of a poem.  It’s absolutely brilliant.  Words cannot describe how amazing this is.  You just have to check it out for yourself.  A description of Still Standing is “the viewer must remain perfectly still, her stillness causing the video-projected text to assemble as if attracted to a magnet.”  Text Rain is similar in that you interact with the letters on the screen but in Text Rain, the letters fall and actually stop on you or whatever you hold up to it.  I can’t really explain it either.  A description of Text Rain is “Text Rain is an interactive installation in which participants use the familiar instrument of their bodies, to do what seems magical—to lift and play with falling letters that do not really exist. In the Text Raininstallation participants stand or move in front of a large projection screen. On the screen they see a mirrored video projection of themselves in black and white, combined with a color animation of falling letters. Like rain or snow, the letters appears to land on participants’ heads and arms. The letters respond to the participants’ motions and can be caught, lifted, and then let fall again. The falling text will ‘land’ on anything darker than a certain threshold, and ‘fall’ whenever that obstacle is removed.”

My goodness that sounds like so much fun!

In the links above, I have provided ways to watch what is being done.  I wish that I could do it from my computer and maybe someday I will be able to.  It just seems like such a cool idea and, in my opinion, sets the bar extremely high for any other form of electronic literature.  This takes the interactive and the electronic and crushes the two together to synthesize into something that is absolutely mind-blowing.

Here are two pictures that may help with what I am talking about.  Still Standing is first and Text Rain is second.

Still, pictures do not do a justice.  You HAVE to watch the videos.  I believe that this sort of interactive aspect mixed with electronic literature is extremely important to electronic literature as a whole because of how involved it makes the user.  Instead of interacting with something on a computer screen by clicking, you are literally interacting by moving.  What’s neat about this is that words, sentences, phrases, and even entire lines from poems are being reconstructed through the act of either ‘standing still’ or holding the text long enough in Text Rain.  It isn’t just letters moving around on a screen, there is actually substance to it and a poetic element that can’t be found elsewhere.  In this instance alone, this form of electronic literature is crucial to the development of further electronic literature in the future.  I’m not sure how to put what I have witnessed into words other than you need to watch the videos!  They are about two minutes a piece and you really should listen to what they have to say about each of the works.  I hope you gained as much from it as I have!

they are evil…

In our discussions in class on this blog, we have talked in some detail about the different perspectives Donna Leishman’s “Red Riding Hood”  presents.  More specifically, we have focused on the apparent feminist perspective that Leishman’s Interactive Fiction seems to take.  I will freely admit now that I continued to play through Red Riding Hood even after the assignment was due in hopes of gaining a clearer interpretation of Leishman’s embedded message.

After several play-through’s and infinite permutations of clicks, combinations, and mouse-overs, however, it finally occurred to me:  perhaps there is no single message.  Instead, perhaps there are many different messages here — all depending upon the way the game is played.  Each time I replayed the game, I was intentionally choosing a different set of actions than before in hopes of producing a new result.  As a result, each play-through yielded a new story altogether.  With that story came a new set of actions, a new set of themes, and a new embedded message that could be derived.

Choosing to wake her up in my first play-through considerably effected my interpretation of the story.

For example, during my first play-through I chose to wake Riding Hood up instead of letting her dream.  Without the dream sequence and the discovery of Red’s diary to cast doubt on her innocence, the message of the story seemed very clear-cut to me:  the wolf represented all men, and men were brutal stalkers, rapists, and murderers.  There were no if’s, and’s, or but’s about it, Leishman was saying that men are evil.

 

The later discovery of Red's diary significantly altered my interpretation of the story.

Yet as I played through the game more and more, my interpretation of the story began to change.  The discovery of her diary, the various images of her dream, and the different interact-able objects I came upon all altered my perspective of the game in some way.  Eventually I began to realize that there was no single perspective or interpretation at hand.  The bigger picture of “Red Riding Hood” could certainly be assigned a meaning, but it was the individual play-through’s themselves that made the difference.

In short, how you interact with the story will define the scope of the perspective.  While we ourselves may know or have memorized the contents of Red’s diary, by choosing not to read it during a play-through we sacrifice the information it provides.  Instead, we must rely on the other parts of the game we interact with to assist us with our interpretation.

Hopefully, this made sense to you and you can identify somewhat with my argument.  There is much that can be said about  Leishman’s piece here, and I encourage you to share your thoughts here as well.  I do, however, have one  request:  please do not reference the new Red Riding Hood movie.  That avenue has been pretty exhausted already….